I tried posting this on my other single mom and dad tribes but nobody responded, dont' know why, but here it goes.....Oh, and Hi, I'm amy!!! So my ex was a bully, hurt my kid, me while I was pregnant and mortally wounded my chihauaha. Just cause he was mad. So I moved far far away and said he would never see his baby as long as he lived. So all of a sudden from everywhere I am getting " He has a right to see his baby, you're being vindictive amy, people change amy, when he sees his baby he'll change amy" and many other helpful guiding notes to lighten my day. So I"m going back to eugene next month and I'm kind of wondering, are they right? am I being a beeyatch? should I let him see his kid even though he was a complete freak? Thanks for any input, and if nobody responds to this, maybe someone could tell me why,,,,,,,,,,too much maybe? thanks, amy
-
Re: hi I'm new and I have a decent question...
Mon, May 5, 2008 - 4:15 PMI think there are times that a parent can be judged too dangerous to be around his,or her,children,especially unsupervised.
as much as I dislike the CPS bureaucracy and the ways they,as I see it ,can really abuse families in the name o f"preventing"abuse...this might,from what you say, be a case for supervised visits. I can;t say I love most of the workers who do the supervising...bu twere it MY child,I'd sure want to know that the other person was stable before I started getting all gushy about how he has some"right"to be a daddy..killing a chihuchua is not the sign of a mentally healthy person...
*maybe* "when he sees the baby he'll change,but I wouldn't bet y life,or my child's life,on it. a kind of scary proportion of people who are violent with children or with other adults start out with abusing pets. and you say he was also violent with you and...do you have another child?
(i did see your post on the other group,just been busy and just now finding time to talk..)
now this may bring all kinds of crap down on me from some circles, but I don't see visitation as an inalienable "right." Being a parent is a RESPONSIBILITY and the first one is to act like a sane human being around whom a child can be safe. I think King Solomon,and every society that tells another version of the story,had it right...when the two women are fighting over the child,theone who intervenes and says,"don;t hurt my baby!" is the "real" parent.
so if you are returning to the city where he lives, you night want to contact a domestic violence agency and find out how to protect yourself and your child, and how to arrange for supervised visits if need be.
be aware that there are risks involved. if you contact him independently and he does something vi9lent, this whacked CPS system can turn around and charge you with "FAILURE TO PROTECT." it stinks,in my opinion...I told you,I don';t think really highly of the child rescuing establishment, and I think they stick their noses places it does not belong far too often and accuse some of the best parents in the world and wind up harming the children they are supposedly helping.whilechildrenoften remaininphysicallyor mentallyabuseivesituations because they are busy harassing the wrong people...
but no you are not being vindictive;you have legitimate reasons for feeling he's got a ways to go before you can feel comfortable bringing your baby around him.
sometimes I feel the larger society still treats children as chattel...property to which biological parents and in some cases other relatives, have a god-given "right" as if the children were livestock purchased at auction. can anyone really argue convincingly that children are somehow "deprived" by not having a parent like this in their lives?or does it matter what the child does or doesn;t get out of the interaction,a person has a "right" to see his baby like a specimen at the zoo? (nobody,or almost nobody,asksthe gorillas or zebras or secretary birds at the zoo whether they want a bunch of people staring at them or taunting them..but it's considered "educational" and thus beneficial for people to see these animals.you get my point?)
you aren't doing it to be vindictive, as I hear it...you are doing it to protect yourself and your child. that'syourfirst responsibility as a mama.
if someone had effectively killed my pet in front of me, I wouldn't feel I owed him shit.
people do change,but I'd want to see evidence that he has been working on himself and his anger problem or whatever it is thatmade him do these ugly things. he should have some kind o f psychological evaluation.
-
Re: hi I'm new and I have a decent question...
Mon, May 5, 2008 - 7:19 PMkeep him away from your kid!! abuse is abuse. I cant stand people who flip abuse around to be vindictive, they are just plain stupid. period
He has a right to see his baby under state supervision. thats it. other wise stay away from the asshole.
just my 2cents.
J. -
-
Re: hi I'm new and I have a decent question...
Tue, May 6, 2008 - 8:08 AMthanks guys. I'll bring someone with me for sure if I do get the guts to see him. Right now I have a restraining order and sole custody so I am totally safe in that area but it's really nice to hear opinions and get backing on my feelings of having full rights over my child's safety. -
-
Re: hi I'm new and I have a decent question...
Tue, May 6, 2008 - 9:30 AMUnless this man has had a ton of counseling, don't do it at all...
He hasn't changed. No matter what you tell yourself, and letting your son see him, is only going to hurt him more... If he could hurt him before, he could hurt him again... -
-
Re: hi I'm new and I have a decent question...
Fri, May 23, 2008 - 9:07 AMI've worked with abuse kids for a long time. Tell your "friends" who are talking about the exes "rights" to fuck off, unless they want to pay medical, counseling, etc., etc., etc. You could go with professionally supervised visitation only. -
-
Re: hi I'm new and I have a decent question...
Thu, May 29, 2008 - 7:10 PMyou know, that feels good. fuck off. i like that. especially since you're a guy, you know. thanks. i was gonna do supervised visits but I'm starting to think if i just stay outta sight outta mind he'll just go away....
-
-
-
-
-
Re: hi I'm new and I have a decent question...
Sun, June 1, 2008 - 6:51 AMI agree with most of the other posters in that you should only allowed a supervised visitation. However, I may have a slightly different angle on the supervision. Obviously every case is unique and I think he failed miserably as a dad and husband, but there is some benefit in your child getting to see a parent and there family, my fear is later in life they will be upset if you deprived the child of visits. I'm a single dad with full custody and an ex wife with issues. I also looked into supervised visitation but the state system did not fit very well, and she just refused to see our son. I did however find that talking to her family helped.
I was actually very impressed with her family which had previously been very rude to me, they were very nice and helpful, they also wanted to see my son and allowed visitation under very protective circumstances. Once again, every case is different. But it started with an aunt of her's, then another, now her parents are very helpful and my son has the bonus of being involved in the ex's family.
Good luck and your not being vindictive or mean, your protecting your child like a good parent should. -
-
Re: hi I'm new and I have a decent question...
Sun, June 1, 2008 - 11:23 AMI just have alot of compassion for people who are fucked up. Especially this guy because everytime I look at my baby, he's spitting image, you know. I know how important blood is, because I'm adopted, and on top of that, they're native, so I want my kid to know his roots. I tried contacting the tribe, and they were cool, but I can't find any family. Both my kids father's families are out of the picture so it's me (no roots) and then my kids have only...me.It's a really tiny family tree, and I desparately want them to know something about where they came from.
Some days I say, hey, maybe he'll shape up, and then the next, I fear the worst, that even introducing them could have severe consequences down the line. I know my son would hate me for not trying, and that's the worst. So I guess i"ll try.
I didn't like the supervised visitation idea, because I wouldn't be allowed to be there. I want to have say over what goes on during those visits, what's being said, etc. I think it's a much better idea to have him come over and me have a very large protective friend or two there.
So it goes. Thanks for the advice guys.
Wish me luck, 12 more days til we fly out of here. -
-
Re: hi I'm new and I have a decent question...
Sat, July 12, 2008 - 3:13 PMFrom the movie Balto..... "I don't wish you luck, I wish you SENSE!"
Blood family can be over rated - has this guy given you any indication he wants to see the baby? Have you given any thought to the fact that if you are there during the visitation he will use your "Mama heart" against you? It's pretty common for an abuser to use a child to regain hold on an ex - seriously unhealthy for you AND your kids. Also, if you initiate contact how does that effect your restraining order?
This is not an event you are allowed control over, which is why you should pick someone to supervise that you trust and the child is comfortable with. You don't get a say in what happens while your child is with his/her other parent, but having supervision in place is a safeguard to maintain an appropriate situation. If your child is an infant how much is going to be said anyway? Considering the way things ended it sounds like you being there while he sees the baby is a very very bad idea.
my .02
-
-